Sons of God
Presented by Your servant, Dan
Email: dan@servantsofyahshua.com
Sons of God – Genesis 6:4 -- explained
The following is a commentary of Genesis 6. It seems the
imaginations of some Evangelical Christians is running wild, promoting the idea
that the remark, “sons of God”, somehow translates to “angels of God”. It
is the purpose of this article and commentary to return the sanity to those who
chose to see the truth. First let’s cover a few things concerning the
reason for this additions work on this subject:
Why is this important? A very basic and simple reason; The
teaching that angels could take human women, marry them (marry?) and procreate
producing children of extraordinary size demeans and reduces the importance of
what our Heavenly Father did in Creating YaHshua, His First Born son of the
flesh. The false teaching means that rebellious angels had this ability
all along and the birth of our Savior is no big deal. While the God of
Heaven “created” the fetus in the virgin girl, Mary, these teachers about
“angels” having sex with human women goes one step above what is possible.
Our Savior clearly tells us that “angels” are neither male nor female, they are a different species, for lack of a better
word. Angels have the ability to reveal themselves, in person or in
vision or dreams and they appear as neither male nor female. Anyone
experiencing an angelic encounter usually sees them as males, from our physical
point of view. Biblically this holds true also, the angels dealing with
the physical people of God appear in view and in a manner with male attributes
but to suggest they have the same sex parts as we humans is to ignore what our
Savior told us concerning “marriage”, for what is the purpose of marriage if
not to have children?
(Mat 22:29-30) YaHshua
answered and said unto them, You do err, not knowing
the scriptures, nor the power of God. For in the
resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the
angels of God in heaven.
Not understanding the “power of God” to create as opposed to the way
we humans do it, our Savior YaHshua clearly states that this will cease and not
be necessary after the Resurrection – Notice, the comparison with the “angels”
– they do not marry. Put this together with Paul’s teaching and we get a
complete picture.
(Gal 3:28) There is neither Jew
nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female:
for you are all one in the Christ YaHshua.
Let’s move on the commentary, verse by verse as we clear away the religious
fog.
(Gen 6:1) And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face
of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
Comment: You will notice the wording here
includes the whole earth, not some island of valley, but the whole earth,
mankind was multiplying. “And daughters were born to them” would only
seem natural, so why this remark, as if it needs to be said? Certainly if
men are multiplying there would be women and sons and daughters. I do not
have the answer for this wording and can only speculate. It is possible
there were two types of men on earth at this time and this particular branch of
men were being singled out by acknowledging their rapid growth in
numbers. We do have reason to suggest this. In Genesis chapter 1 we
read about the creation, then in Genesis 2 it changes – the creation is
finished -- men and women are told to multiply then in Chapter Two everything
changes. The creation if finished but now YaHWeH is making a Garden
somewhere on this already created world. Once He has finished the Garden
He then makes a man, a single man, and puts him in the Garden, then some time
later he put the man to sleep and from him He creates a woman. All of
this appears to be far removed from the account in the First Chapter – two
creations of men? If this is a possibility that would explain the odd
wording found in this first verse of Genesis 6. It is not an issue of
“salvation” and not being presented a doctrine of any kind, only
speculation.
(Gen 6:2) That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were
fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Comment: This verse has been abused so many
times it is hard to tell where to begin. It really is not hard to dispel
this idea that this remark, “sons of God” is not talking about angles, or
rather fallen angels. For one thing if this were the case they would not
be called “sons of God” but rather, “demons of Satan”, or even, “fallen
angels”. Next is the clear statement that these “sons of God” took wives
– they married these daughters of men. Angels do not marry, just as our
Lord, YaHshua, made clear -- For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor
are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven – the
comparison does not need any interpretation and is clear, but apparently the
words of our Lord, YaHshua, upsets the desire of some to continue in this false
teaching continuing to say these “sons of God” that took wives were
angels. When confronted with this verse they tried to skirt it, even
though it is coming from the one that should know, our
Savior, YaHshua. Finally, one of the better names among the Evangelical
teachers came up with a solution to this problem and figured out a way around
what our Savior was teaching. This teacher of men said that while
puzzling over this point of disagreement from our Savior it sudden struck him
that these were “angels in heaven” not on earth – problem solved, our Savior,
according to this genius, was talking about angles in heaven and not about
angels on earth. So, according to this kind of thinking whatever happens
in heaven is not what happens on earth. Now we can all ignore what
our Savior was teaching. This is ridiculous reasoning but that is the
best they have while trying to teach a doctrine of demons, the angels of the
Devil.
The odd fact that it is mentioned the “daughters of men” were “fair” or
“beautiful” to look at suggest, as in verse one (see comment above), that there
is perhaps two types of men on earth. First we see a type of men in the
first creation. Elohim (plural for more than one) creates the Heavens and
the Earth and mankind and tells them to multiply. Then a second man is
created, called Adam, separate from the others, being placed in a Garden apart
from the others. Now, if this speculation has any merit we can see one
group of men, looking at the daughters of another group and marrying out of
their class. This has nothing to do with fallen angels, not one word here
about angels, only about “men”.
It is also possible the Sons of God were faithful followers of YaHWeH and
by desiring to marry outside of their faith, and doing just that, the wickedness
and rebellion against their Creator was complete. Look at the New
Covenant, our Lord and Savior, YaHshua, making it possible for us, as believers
to become “children of God” and as “children”, sons and daughters. We
then, are sons of God today, in this time, just as in the days of
Noah.
Faulty reasoning: An Angel of YaHWeH
visited Mary and Joseph and told them the Name they were to name our
Savior. King James, government commission and approved bible to be
translated into the English language, inserted a false name, a name the Angel
Gabriel never mentioned, a false name -- IESUS, later changed to JESUS.
The Name delivered by the Angel Gabriel was YaHshua. This
name is found in the KJV Torah as JOSHUA, a transliteration of the Hebrew
name given to our Savior. Instead of using this Name they
substituted a name inherited from the Roman Church. The faulty
thinking comes in when we look at the name of this Angel, deliverer of our
Savior's Name, YaHshua (Joshua). The name Gabriel means, "man of
God", or "man of El". If we then use the faulty
thinking and reasoning of those teaching the "sons of God" in
Genesis 6 means angels we could just as easily point out that a High
Ranking Angel, Gabriel, or "Man of God" would then mean the
"daughters of men" were actually daughters of angels -- see where
this heads? Is anyone suggesting this? No, not at all but the same
reasoning as the faulty reasoning concerning the "sons of God", being
applied to this example is just as sound, maybe mores so, than the faulty
reasoning that the "sons of God" means "angels of
God". Strong's Hebrew/Greek Dictionary -- H1403 - Gabrale -- G1043 - Gabriel -- "man of God" .
Can you see where this kind of reasoning goes crazy? That should be the
end of it, but it is not. As those teaching false doctrines such as this
go on to say the Giants (nephilim) were the children of these "sons of
god" -- Not sons of YaHWeH. Besides, when did our Creator ever call
an angel His son?
(Heb 1:5) For unto which of the angels said He at any time, You
are my Son, this day have I begotten you? And again, I will be to him a Father,
and he shall be to me a Son?
(Act 13:33) God has fulfilled the same unto us
their children (children of Israel), in that he has raised
up YaHshua, again as it is also written in the second psalm; Thou are my Son,
this day have I begotten you (YaHshua, in fulfilling the promise).
(Psa 2:7) I will declare the decree: the YHWH (YaHWeH) hath said unto me,
Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
Our Creator has never called and Angel His son. Then someone will
quote Job 1, "...sons of god", speaking about the Angels gathered to
together, but the verses just quoted should give us a heads up that this verse
in Job is a mistranslation. When you look at this verse in Job we see
that "sons", according to the Hebrew could just as easily have been
translated as "servants", and we do have a New Testament teaching,
other than the verses just given, to support this --
(Heb 1:14) Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who
shall be heirs of salvation?
(Rev 19:10) And I fell at his feet to worship him.
And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant,
and of thy brethren that have the testimony of YaHshua: worship God: for the
testimony of YaHshua is the spirit of prophecy.
We are not to worship angels, they are "servants" and
"ministering spirits", not sons as those teachers of Genesis 6 teach
concerning this term, "sons of God", thus it holds true, also, that this
word for "sons" in Genesis could be translated as "servants of
god", but would anyone then dare say this means "servant angels"
then? Think about it, if that were true they would not be called
"servants" and not "sons" but "demons and devils"
or at the least, "fallen angels" but the wording says not such thing. As mentioned in another article and
study on this same subject if we remove the fog of religion and reading the
book of Job again we see that Satan is mentioned, separately from the others,
and if these "sons of God" is meant for the angels gathered there it
is not a reference to Satan, a fallen angel, his is mentioned apart from them
and would not, nor his angels, qualify as "sons of God".
(Rev 12:7) And there was war in heaven: Michael
and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
Satan has angels and they are not called "angels of god" and
certainly not, "sons of god". This verse in Revelation reveals
the timing that Satan and his angles were cast out of Heaven.
This event occurred after our Savior was raised and returned to Heaven,
restored to the Glory He had before. This is the time the demon angels
were denied any further access to the Heavenly throne, Satan and his angels no
longer allowed to come in among the true "servants of God" -- and
there was rejoicing in Heaven, when this happened, but sorrow expressed for the
earth for Satan and his angels are not trapped on Earth, and they are
not happy.
(Rev 12:8-9) And prevailed not; neither was their place
found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that
old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceives the whole world: he
was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
(Gen 6:3) And the LORD (YaHWeH) said, My
spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet
his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
Comment: It
appears the Spirit of the Living God, the Creator of
all things was living with and struggling with man. Strong’s Hebrew
Dictionary, strive, H1777, Contend, minister, plead. From
this verse we can determine that the Spirit of the Creator was dealing, in a
personal way, with mankind but to no use as even with this, men continued down
their wicked path. By withdrawing His Spirit, ending the struggle between
His spirit and the flesh the years of men were
shortened. The long ages of men prior to this may have been more due to
His Spirit being so closely linked to the people of then than anything
else. It is no irony that from the time of this statement, 120 years
later the great flood would cover the whole earth.
(Gen 6:4) There were giants in the earth in those days; and also
after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty
men which were of old, men of renown.
Comment: This is a real tricky verse, or
so it seems for some. When we read or hear what the teachers of the
doctrine on Fallen Angels taking wives from among men, they suddenly jump over
all good reasoning and tell us these “giants”, or in the Hebrew, “nephilim” are
the product of the union between angels and beautiful human women. Nearly
all of the teachers of this false doctrine go to the Book of Enoch for this
part of the tale, because your Bible clearly does not teach this, so they have
to resort to outside sources, even if it is a source that has been discredited
over and over again. Read this verse in your own bible again – “…in those
days…” there were “giants” or “nephilim”. In what days?
In the days that the “sons of God” were taking wives from among men. In
those same days there were “giants” but it never says these “giants” were men
and it certainly does not say they were the “offspring” of fallen angels.
Only in the Book of Enoch is this suggest – no – stated as fact. The Book
of Enoch is a work of fiction from before Christ that has been reconstituted
and embellished as a work of fact. This book teaches – believe it or not
– that these “nephilim” grew upwards to 240 feet tall.
It is very possible these “giants” were giant animals – bone are still
being dug up proving that giant animals, “nephilim” if you will, roamed this
earth and that is not disputed at all. Here we have a clear statement
that in the time of the fall of man, in the time these “sons of God” were
taking wives from among the population, as many as they chose (?) there were
giant creatures roaming, not only at that time but afterward also.
From this union between the Sons of God and the daughters of common men the
children did not become giants but men or rulers of renown. There seems
to be the suggestion that these unions led to some kind of unity among all
people of the flesh and so their children become famous and of reputation, but
look what happens – wickedness rules and they begin to move away from their
Creator. So far away they cannot return and it becomes necessary to act,
to destroy the cancer that has spread to the point of no return. Still, no mention of angles in this.
(Gen 6:5) And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in
the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was
only evil continually.
Comment: This should be the nail that puts
this to rest – “And God (YHWH) saw that the wickedness of MAN…”, not “angel” but of man, it was the mind (heart) of men
that was “evil continually” – no mention of any angels, not even of Satan,
none. The problem with men is not angels taking their daughters to marry;
the problem is with men or mankind. Says so right here.
(Gen 6:6) And it repented the LORD (YHWH) that He had made man on the
earth, and it grieved Him at his heart.
Comment: If the creator of all things is
sad, or “grieved” can it be compared with our grief? His love is greater
than our and His grief would also be greater. We cannot imagine how much
this hurt our Creator, and being forced to act as He did. He had to stop
the insanity, but He did not give up on us completely saving Noah to carry on –
we, through Noah, are given a second chance and so, here we are
today.
(Gen 6:7) And the LORD (YHWH) said, I will destroy man whom I have
created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping
thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me
that I have made them.
Comment: It repented Him for having made
man (Strong’s H5162 – to be sorry). And where are the angels in
all of this? They are not mentioned and how strange is that if the “sons
of God” who started all of this trouble, as they teach it, are supposed to be
bad behaving angels not being mentioned at all, not one word?
(Gen 6:8) But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
Comment: Here is the great mercy of our
Creator. Even though he regretted having made man, and being the Creator
He had every right to end or prolong or to start over if He decided. In
this case He looked a Noah and decided to try again, on a smaller scale.
Everything was changed. The Giant animals, mentioned earlier were buried
in huge volumes of silt from the flood and are being uncovered today.
Animals in the far North have been found frozen in solid ice, Mammoth elephants
and others from a time before the Ice. The environment of the pre-flood
days appear to have been much milder than now, tropical, even, the world over.
(Gen 6:10) And Noah begat three sons, Shem,
Ham, and Japheth.
(Gen 6:11) The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was
filled with violence.
(Gen 6:12) And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was
corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
Comment: We are
told Noah had three sons, from these sons would come the people we are
today. It is repeated that the earth was corrupt and filled with
violence. And what does this last verse say? "... for all
FLESH had corrupted HIS way upon earth" Not one mention of angels in
any form. These were the days of Noah, and of mankind, not of fallen
angels. Read it again, not one mention or even allusion to fallen angels.
(Gen 6:13) And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before
me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will
destroy them with the earth.
Comment: This is getting redundant but true – no
mention of angel, good or bad. Listen to what YaHWeH says to Noah, “…the
earth is filled with violence through them …” and who is the “them”, who is it He is going to “destroy with the earth”?
Men, not angels and there is no mention whatsoever about man being corrupted by
fallen angels. Angels are not faulted for the fall of man, not once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
I would challenge any Bible teacher to show us where the angels, or even
Satan, are given the responsibility for the Fall of
man? And to answer the question, Do angels
marry? And prove it biblically. It cannot be prove, of course, as there
is not place in our Bibles that says, or teaches such a thing. The only
way this can be conjured up is by introducing outside sources and then the
twisting of the Word.
Cross Species Failure --
There is an issue here that is rebellious against our Heavenly Father –
cross species. The idea that species can be cross bred happens only in
the imaginations of men. Only our Heavenly Father can do such a thing,
not angels. We read of such a creature in Ezekiel 1:5, a creature that
transport the Throne of YaHWeH appearing to be composed of various types of
animals and of man, but this is a spirit vehicle, created by the Creator of all
things. Among men He, our Creator, has determined this would not be
possible, and nowhere are we clearly told that created angels have this
ability, not one verse – only from the imaginations of men.
Dogs cannot cross with cats, elephants with cow, etc., etc., etc., this
only happens in the movies or in the writings and teachings of men attempting
to make “fiction” fact –
(1Co 15:39-41) All flesh is not
the same: Men have one kind of flesh, animals have
another, birds another and fish another. There are also heavenly bodies
and there are earthly bodies; but the splendor of the heavenly bodies is one
kind, and the splendor of the earthly bodies is another. NIV
Well, maybe not just the doctrines of men --
(1Ti 4:1) Now the Spirit speaks
expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving
heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
So, just who would be teaching that spirit beings can procreate with
flesh? Only our Heavenly Father can and has ever done that, but what He
did was to create a child, He did not do what those teaching the angels
did. How did He create this Child?
(Rom 4:17) “… God, who quickens
the dead, and calls those things which be not as
though they were”.
Hear that? All He has to do is say it and it is. He calls
things that never existed before into being.
(Psa
33:9) For He spoke, and it was done; he
commanded, and it stood fast.
(Psa
148:5) Let them praise the Name of the LORD (YHWH): for He commanded, and
they were created.
To suggest that angels, fallen angels, no less, have this kind of creative
power is what led to the fall of the fallen angels – they idea they could rise
above their Creator. Satan and his angels find themselves contained on
this earth and those in heaven rejoiced because that trouble maker is cast out
and no longer tormenting those in Heaven, no more disruption in Heaven but now
He and his angels are on this earth – wow to us for Satan is here.
(Rev 12:7) And there was war in
heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought
and his angels,
(Rev 12:8) And prevailed not;
neither was their place found any more in heaven.
(Rev 12:9) And the great dragon
was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceives the
whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with
him.
It is revealed in this chapter of Revelation we are given the time of
this event and the casting out of Satan and his angels. With this
information we can see that the concept that Satan and his demon angels were
cast to this earth and then, in their rebellion took human women as wives is
false. There are too many verses contradicting or questioning the “sons
of God”, in Genesis 6 is fallen angels to build a doctrine such as this.
The prime reason to reject this teaching is the fact it is an insult to what
our Heavenly Father did in bringing to us His Son, YaHshua, our Savior.
The suggestion that fallen angels can procreate and have children is further
insult to the Gospel message. This is a false doctrine from the influence
of devils and demons.
You can read all of the books and subjects entertaining this idea of the
Nephilim as giant children spawned by spirit beings having sex with human
women, women they saw as beautiful, so beautiful and fair they just had to
marry them -- really? As believers we accept YaHshua as our Savior – the
Gospel message about Him and the coming Kingdom of God is what is
important. This false doctrine throws a shadow over the birth of our
Savior, YaHshua and should be rejected. This false doctrine is gleaned
from the writing of the Super Rabbis of old compiled in what the Rabbis of
today call the Oral Torah – well, it was “oral” until they put it into
writing.
According to the ancients the writings Moses received, known as the
Torah (first 5 books of the Old Testament), were only a brief on the original
Oral Torah passed down, orally, from Adam to each of the Great Rabbis of the
past. Supposedly this “oral” tradition filled in the apparent blanks left
behind by the Torah of Moses – a kind of filling in between the lines – in
advance, that is. It is in these writings that the “sons of god” in
Genesis 6 are said to be fallen angels and the reason for the fall and
destruction of mankind. The Apostles called these writing, “fables” and
instructed us, the followers of YaHshua not to give them any attention.
However, today, many followers are being duped into accepting these Jewish
fables as fact, as these false writings drip down through history and are taken
by fiction writers, or authors and turned into works like that of the Book of Jasher, and the Book of Enoch.
Want more information on these two Books – which, by the way, appear to be
of modern creation built upon Jewish tales, fables, from the past. Go to
this expose on the Book of Jasher and other links to
the Exposing of the Book of Enoch --
http://www.answers.org/bible/jasher-book-of.html
Conclusion: It is significant,
however, to note that there is no Book of Jasher in Charesworth's Volumes of Pseudepigrapha. The reason is that
there are no ancient copies of the Book of Jasher.
The earliest version may be represented in translation in the 1840 version
promoted by some Mormons or it may also be a fogery
from 1625. If it is authentic it contains at best, Jewish midrash
from the medieval period, but as the documentation show above shows, not even
the original translators and publishers were certain of its authenticity.
http://www.tentmaker.org/books/FamousBiblicalHoaxes.html
In this book, Goodspeed
discusses a number of “curious frauds that when they first appear . . . are
promptly unmasked; but a generation, or a century, later, long after their
exposure has been forgotten, they are revived by somebody and make a fresh bid
for acceptance” (viii). Though ignored by scholars as unworthy of
attention, such texts get peddled to the unsuspecting (or credulous) general
public, and in these internet-days they can be touted around the world in a matters of weeks. To his credit, Goodspeed took the time to research, describe, and examine
critically a number of these items. His book is no longer in print, but
is worth perusing still.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/book_of_enoch.htm
Is the Book of Enoch really a lost book of the Bible? A born-again Christian who has been
reading the Bible for several years only needs to read the "Book of
Enoch" briefly to know that something is very wrong. There are so
many obvious flaws with this alleged missing book of God's Word. It is
clear to me that someone copied from the Bible and wrote this garbage.
The same type of mumbo-jumbo can be readily observed in the Qur'an. I do
NOT believe that Enoch, who lived during the time period of Genesis, wrote this
manuscript. Evidently the King James translators didn't either, and for
good reason. The Devil is working relentlessly to corrupt God's Word, as
he has been doing since the Garden of Eden, when he caused Eve to doubt God's
Word. Satan is so shrewd that he even tried to confuse our Lord by
misinterpreting the Scriptures in Matthew 4:1-10. In these apostate
times, the Word of God is under attack like never before. The reason why
is simple... if Satan can pervert the Word of God into a lie, then he can
control the masses!
http://www.yahshuaservant.com/enoch--the-book-of-enoch.htm
http://www.yahshuaservants.com/Enoch__The_Book.htm
http://www.yahshuaservants.com/Angels_in_Marriage_Part1.htm
http://www.yahshuaservant.com/angels-marry-women--part-2.htm
There is an expression for documents purporting to be some long lost or
hidden mystery writings -- Pseudepigrapha -- and it might help to understand
this term and its meaning:
American Heritage
Dictionary:
pseud-e-pig-ra-pha (soodi-pigr-f)pl.n. 1.
Spurious writings, especially writings falsely attributed to biblical
characters or times. 2. A body
of texts written between 200 B.C. and A.D. 200 and spuriously ascribed to various prophets and kings
of Hebrew Scriptures.[Greek, from neuter pl. of pseudepigraphos,
falsely ascribed : pseudes, false. See PSEUDO- + epigraphein, to inscribe : epi-, epi- + graphein, to write. See gerbh-.]--pseud'e-pig'ra-phal
(-r-fl).
or pseud'ep-i-graph'ic
(soodep-i-grafik). or pseud'ep-i-graph'i-cal (-i-kl). or pseud'e-pig'ra-phous
(-r-fs). adj.
The origin of these spurious writings is from the Rabbi, extraordinaire,
and Hebrew Sages, and even witch doctors of the same. How can I say
this? Read the definition again and you see it has to do with a period of
time involving the Hebrews. When you find their writings of today, the
Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem Talmud and the, newer writings called the,
Midrash, we find the Rabbis of the Oral Torah and after were practicing Black
Magic. These ancient super religious leaders were allow
to deal in black magic because they were the only ones able to control such
things. It is also the accusation of the enemies of the Christ that He
used black magic to do the miracles He did, but, according to those critics, he
was using this Black Magic to do evil. However, the ancient Rabbis used
Black Magic only for good. What a contradiction, and it is from these
sources the idea of Angels marrying human women and being the fathers of
giants, known as the Nephilim, and the fall of mankind leading to the total
destruction of the world.
Mid-rash (midrash)n.pl. Mid-rash-im (mid-roshim, midra-shem). Any of a group of Jewish commentaries on the Hebrew
Scriptures compiled between A.D. 400 and 1200 and based on exegesis, parable, and
haggadic legend.[Late Hebrew midras,
commentary, explanation, Midrash, from daras,
to interpret.]
The fight for truth never ends. One generation discovers the frauds
and exposes the lies then a new generation comes on the scene and if the
previous generation fails to remind the children following them about these
“doctrines of devil”, giving heed to seducing spirits (1 Tim 4:1) then each
succeeding generation may be more susceptible to these lying Spirits. Remember,
Satan, did not lie, totally, to Eve. No, he
discussed what was true then interjected a doubt, then a lie. We need to
stay in our own Bibles, listen to our own spirit and the spirit of our Savior
to keep us in the clear, in the light, removing the religious fog of false
teachings demeaning the act of Salvation by our Savior, YaHshua.
Peace
dan@servantsofyahshua.com